Skip to content

Correct ERA5 timestamp convention#2773

Open
AdamRJensen wants to merge 2 commits into
pvlib:mainfrom
AdamRJensen:update-era5-timestamp-convention
Open

Correct ERA5 timestamp convention#2773
AdamRJensen wants to merge 2 commits into
pvlib:mainfrom
AdamRJensen:update-era5-timestamp-convention

Conversation

@AdamRJensen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

  • Closes Incorrect timestamp index description in iotools.era5 docstring #2772
  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • I attest that all AI-generated material has been vetted for accuracy and is in compliance with the pvlib license
  • Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file in docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with :issue:`num` or this Pull Request with :pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with :ghuser:`user`).
  • New code is fully documented. Includes numpydoc compliant docstrings, examples, and comments where necessary.
  • Pull request is nearly complete and ready for detailed review.
  • Maintainer: Appropriate GitHub Labels (including remote-data) and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.

See discussion in #2772.

@AdamRJensen AdamRJensen added this to the v0.15.2 milestone Jun 2, 2026
@AdamRJensen AdamRJensen changed the title Correct era5 timestamp convention Correct ERA5 timestamp convention Jun 2, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Incorrect timestamp index description in iotools.era5 docstring

1 participant