Skip to content

Increasing adoption of configuration defined in proto! #62

@bwplotka

Description

@bwplotka

Hey,

Sorry for the spam, but I just noticed this cool project. 🤗

Just want to let you know that we started a new open-source initiative to make proto a default way for defining your configuration (finally!)

Looks like your engine might fit nicely into this area (might as extension/generator?)

Ideas and feedback are welcome: https://github.com/protoconfig/protoconfig

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type
    No fields configured for issues without a type.

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions